Is preview benefit from word n + 2 a common effect in reading Chinese? Evidence from eye movements.

Read Writ · 2012 · PMC3337415 · PMID 22593625

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0680

closest p · 1.4× alpha

0.0680

boldest claim

The sentences

only marginally significantp = .068so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

When the boundary was after n − 1, gaze duration was longer in the dissimilar condition, than in the identical condition, but the effect was only marginally significant, b = 20, SE = 10.8, p = .068; although the same pattern was observed for first fixation duration and single fixation, this effect was not significant, p s > .2.

also in 5,072 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.