highly significantp < 0.001
−0.8 μV; F (1, 31) = 3.55, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.103] while there was a highly significant N2 enhancement in the switch trials [0.6 vs. −0.8 μV; F (1, 31) = 12.59, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.289], for t 1 and t 2, respectively.
−0.8 μV; F (1, 31) = 3.55, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.103] while there was a highly significant N2 enhancement in the switch trials [0.6 vs. −0.8 μV; F (1, 31) = 12.59, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.289], for t 1 and t 2, respectively.
Furthermore, there was an interaction SESSION × GROUP [ F (3, 137) = 5.1, p < 0.005, η 2 = 0.102] as well as a strong trend for a SESSION × GROUP × BLOCK interaction [ F (3, 137) = 2.7, p = 0.054, η 2 = 0.054].