Does the reading of different orthographies produce distinct brain activity patterns? An ERP study.

PLoS One · 2012 · PMC3352908 · PMID 22615746

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0500

closest p · 1.0× alpha

0.0700

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp≤ .05actually significant

The interaction between type of stimulus and form of script was marginally significant ( F (1,31) = 4.08, p≤ .05, η p 2 = .12). t -tests suggested significantly longer reaction times in response to the pointed script only in reading of words ( t (31) = 3.29, p <.01).

also in 26,082 other papers

approached significancep = .07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The main effect of stimulus approached significance ( F ( 1,31 ) = 3.50, p = .07, η p 2 = .10).

also in 8,237 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.