marginally significantp = 0.06
This revealed significant main effects for JA condition , F (1, 25) = 8.35, p < 0.008, η 2 = 0.25, and a marginally significant effect for stimuli , F (1, 25) = 2.97, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.11.
This revealed significant main effects for JA condition , F (1, 25) = 8.35, p < 0.008, η 2 = 0.25, and a marginally significant effect for stimuli , F (1, 25) = 2.97, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.11.
However, the convergent pattern of a significant correlation between spatial working memory and IJA performance in Study 1 ( r = 0.46) and a correlation that approached significance, with no evidence of a reliable association with RJA, suggests that spatial working memory may be a more consistent or stronger correlate of IJA than RJA process in adults.