marginally significantp = .056
For flanker notes, a similar ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of group, F (1, 30) = 3.94, p = .056, and the main effect of crowding was significant, F (1, 30) = 178.3, p < .0001.
For flanker notes, a similar ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of group, F (1, 30) = 3.94, p = .056, and the main effect of crowding was significant, F (1, 30) = 178.3, p < .0001.
For staff lines, the Group × Stimulus (staff lines/Landolt Cs) interaction on log contrast threshold approached significance, F (1, 30) = 3.79, p = .06.