In the cohort starting 2004 ( Table 1 ) there was no significant change in the score for learning approach by the beginning of academic year 2008 (Year 5; for intercalating students, Year 4), although the fall in surface score almost achieved significance.
5
—
—
The sentences
The deep score increased, but did not achieve significance, although the rise in the score for one of its subscales, interest in ideas, did. The students who started in 2005 ( Table 5 ) also showed a fall in the surface score, but this did not quite achieve significance, although its subscale, fear of failure, did.
There was a slight trend towards a rise in scores for deep and strategic approach, and fall in those for surface approach over Years 1–5, but in only some cohorts were these statistically significant.
The strategic score increased by 6.57 and almost reached significance at 0.051.
When this cohort was tested the following year ( Table 3 ) the rise in alertness to assessment and monitoring effectiveness persisted, but a fall in achieving was no longer evident; in the surface subscales there was a fall in fear of failure, but the slight rise in syllabus boundness did not achieve significance.