Barely Significant
← all excerpts

New endoscopic hemostasis methods.

Clin Endosc · 2012 · PMC3429741 · PMID 22977807

1
hedged sentence
0.0600
closest p · 1.2× alpha
0.0600
boldest claim

The sentences

showed a trendp =0.06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
3 compared mono- to dual therapy and found that dual endoscopic therapy reduced the risk of recurrent bleeding (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.88; p <0.001), risk of emergency surgery (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.89; p =0.03), and showed a trend toward a reduction in the risk of death (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.46 to 1.02; p =0.06) ( Fig. 1 ). 3 In subgroup analysis, dual therapy was significantly superior to injection therapy alone for all the outcomes considered, but failed to demonstrate that any combination of treatments is better than either mechanical therapy alone or thermal therapy alone.

also in 53,322 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.