Barely Significant
← all excerpts

High resolution X chromosome-specific array-CGH detects new CNVs in infertile males.

PLoS One · 2012 · PMC3467283 · PMID 23056185

2
hedged sentences
0.0030
closest p · 0.1× alpha
0.0780
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp = 0.003actually significant
On the other hand, comparing the frequencies of subjects with ≥1 CNV in cases versus controls, we observed a highly significant difference when considering the total number of CNVs (p = 0.003) and of losses (p<0.001) ( Table 5B ).

also in 132,142 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep = 0.078so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Although the frequency of patients with more than one CNV (n = 19; 19.8%) was nearly twice that of controls (n = 11; 10.7%), the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.078).

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.