A robust method of measuring other-race and other-ethnicity effects: the Cambridge Face Memory Test format.

The memory advantage for European faces was 11% (on Hits – False Alarms measure), and with N = 25 this difference was only modestly significant (p = .021).

also in 257 other papers

Of the 10 random subsamples, all produced a trend in the correct direction (i.e., all still had Australian observers showing CFMT-Australian greater than CFMT-Harvard), but only 4 runs produced a significant interaction (range p = .016 to p = .025), 4 runs produced an interaction approaching significance (range p = .054 to p = .093), and 2 produced very small effects (p = .121, p = .418).

also in 2,640 other papers

Testing the Cambridge Face Memory Test original version (CFMT-original; European-ancestry faces from Boston USA) and a new Cambridge Face Memory Test Chinese (CFMT-Chinese), with European and Asian observers, we report a race-of-face by race-of-observer interaction that was highly significant despite modest sample size and despite observers who had quite high exposure to the other race.

also in 132,142 other papers