“approaching significance”

However, there was a relationship approaching significance ( P = 0⋅052) between number of family meals per week and children meeting the screen time recommendations: Descriptively, families who ate 3–6 meals together per week had a higher prevalence of children meeting recommendations compared to children with families who ate 1–2 meals or greater than 7 meals per week.

Interestingly, only three AD risk variants exhibited genome‐wide ( p < 5 × 10 −8 ) significance or a level approaching significance ( p < 1 × 10 −5 ) with baseline memory performance, including rs429358 ( APOE , p = 2.03 × 10 −33 ), rs6733839 ( BIN1 , p = 3.96 × 10 −7 ), and rs4844610 ( CR1 , p = 8.43 × 10 −6 ).

Inter-subject correlations were significant for all categories, with the exception of ‘engaged’, which was approaching significance: distracted, t(1860) = 3.57, p < 0.001, n = 1861; reflecting, t(2374) = 2.79, p = 0.005, n = 2375; engaged, t(2591) = 1.51, p = 0.13, n = 2592); immersed, t(1824) = 3.23, p = 0.001, n = 1825.

Single Gouldian finches had a higher frequency of head movements than most other group sizes with significant differences to group sizes of two and 5–7 birds and approaching significance for group sizes of 3–4 birds (bootstrapping: 1 vs 2 birds: p = 0.010, 1 vs 3–4 birds: p = 0.062, 1 vs 5–7 birds: p = 0.019, 1 vs > 7 birds: p = 0.169; Fig 3 ).

As shown in Figure 3 C , for amputees we found a significant (above zero) correlation between both contralateral and ipsilateral ROIs relative to the typical contralateral representational structure in controls (amputees contralateral, t (15) = 6.82; p < 0.001; amputees ipsilateral, t (15) = 4.38; p < 0.001; one-sample t test; Bonferroni’s adjusted α , 0.05/2 = 0.025), whereas the correlation between one-handers and controls was approaching significance for the contralateral ROI only (one-handers contralateral, t (12) = 2.51; p = 0.027; one-handers ipsilateral, t (12) = 1.70; p = 0.114; Bonferroni’s adjusted α , 0.05/2 = 0.025).

We observed an enrichment of TWAS genes in the comparison between NASH and CTL samples, approaching significance ( P = 0.034; P -adj = 0.103) (Table S13).

65.38 ± 0.02%), with a pooled MD of 0.08 (95% CI: 0.01–0.15, I 2 = 77.15%) than the male group, albeit with a p -value approaching significance ( p = 0.036).

25.42%, p = 0.073, approaching significance) and were more often unmarried (29.17% vs. 15.25%, p = 0.045).

Another important finding was that male (615.6 ± 311.50 pg/ml) and female (701.5 ± 267.50 pg/ml) GAD patients showed no significant variation in serum IL-23 levels (p = 0.385, two-tailed student t-test). Association between different demographic and clinical covariates with GAD severity The correlation between IL-17A and GAD-7 scores was found to be statistically significant (r = 0.397, p = 0.032), with the correlation being most pronounced among females (r = 0.578, p = 0.048) and approaching significance among males (r = 0.459, p = 0.047) (Fig. 1 bi).

The significant predictors were age ( B = 0.051, SE = 0.016, p = 0.001), emotion management ( B = 0.470, SE = 0.147, p = 0.002) and, approaching significance, conscientiousness ( B = 0.034, SE = 0.017, p = 0.050).

Interleukin 10 (IL-10) was detectable in many of the mice treated with HER2 T-BsAb but was highest in the two highest dose groups ( Figure 7C ) , with the 3 μg group being significantly higher compared to the no treatment control (p = 0.0003) and the 10 μg group approaching significance (p = 0.05).

On d 21, the challenge was observed to have an effect on the expression of the IL-10 gene, approaching significance ( p = 0.05).

( 2022 ) used asynchronous delivery and found that improvements in wellbeing from pre to post for girls, was approaching significance ( p = 0.05), but pre-post changes were non-significant for boys ( p > 0.05).

A log‐rank test applied on the survival curves of the two cohorts for each model demonstrated no statistically significant difference for the InceptionResNet or the clinical model, an approaching significance ( p = 0.05) for the InceptionResNet + LSTM model, and a significant difference for the InceptionResNet + LSTM model with clinical feature fusion.

Similarity ratings for the nose ( M = 3.70, SD = 0.64) were also close to the scale mid-point, although this difference was approaching significance, t (19) = 2.09, p = .050, d = 0.47.

As shown in Table 3 , the moderation term was approaching significance for primary control, R 2 Δ = 0.02, F (1, 203) = 3.81, p = 0.05.

From baseline to 12 months, there was a mean improvement in Fibrosis‐4 (FIB‐4) scores approaching significance (0.26 ± 0.38, 95% CI: 0.003,5.12; p = 0.05) and true significant improvement in mean NFS (2.78 ± 0.92, 95% CI: 2.16, 3.40; p < 0.001).

Further, significant improvements in reaction time were also found in the SRA during the 2- and 3-back tests and approaching significance in the STEP ( p = 0.05) for the 3-back.

For the model including race/ethnicity and sex pairs as the main independent variable of interest, rates of AF/AFL-related acute healthcare utilization were observed to be the highest among White women (17.4%) and lowest among Asian men (10.3%), with results approaching significance for race/ethnicity and sex (chi-square P value = .0509) ( Table 2 ).

The results indicated that the correlation between responses to the anticipation question and responses to the disappointment question was not statistically significant, but was approaching significance ( r s = 0.091, p = .051, N = 55). 3.3 Experiment 3 We first confirmed that all participants answered all test questions, and that no participants failed to respond correctly (i.e. “Paris”) to the attention check question.

However, while approaching significance [F(1, 262) = 3.85, p = 0.051], the main effect of housing was not significant.

There were insignificant correlations for all of them by a Spearman rank test, whereas the P value for Pvs230 was approaching significance ( P = .051).

WC was not significant but approaching significance in the expected direction for any AMD (p=0.051).

Two Faecalibacterium ASVs were approaching significance (ASV1) and significantly (ASV2) associated with higher rMED scores (ASV1: rho = 0.3273, p = 0.0514; ASV2: rho = 0.4322, p < 0.01, Figure 3 E).

All covariates significantly differing ( p < 0.05) or approaching significance ( p < 0.052) between the language groups were included as predictor variables in the multivariate linear regression analysis for outcome variables that significantly differed in the univariate analyses.