failed to reach significancep < 0.01
The main effect of word type was significant by participants but failed to reach significance by items [ F 1(1, 39) = 8.29, p < 0.01; F 2(1, 35) = 2.35, p < 0.13].
The main effect of word type was significant by participants but failed to reach significance by items [ F 1(1, 39) = 8.29, p < 0.01; F 2(1, 35) = 2.35, p < 0.13].
Note that the difference in RT between the two word types was in fact greater for the repetition group than for the semantic-categorization group, although this trend did not reach statistical significance.