Second-order conditioning and conditioned inhibition: influences of speed versus accuracy on human causal learning.

In the speed group, there was evidence of second-order conditioning, F (1, 37) = 4.65, p = .038, with higher ratings to BX than to BE, while conditioned inhibition in the accuracy group was marginally non-significant, F (1, 39) = 3.38, p = .074, with lower ratings to BX than to BE (see Figure 5 ).

also in 1,493 other papers

In the present study, group interactions and second-order conditioning were present in both experiments, with the conditioned inhibition effect in Experiment 2 approaching significance.

also in 2,640 other papers

Unpaced training, with instructions and feedback emphasising accuracy, resulted in learning that was consistent with conditioned inhibition, although several of the simple effects in both experiments failed to reach significance.

also in 4,113 other papers