Predictive brain signals of linguistic development.

Front Psychol · 2013 · PMC3567457 · PMID 23404161

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0520

closest p · 1.0× alpha

0.0770

boldest claim

The sentences

almost significantp = 0.052so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The Negative responders’ scores fall on average at 1.5 SD above the LQ mean, and the inter-group difference is significant for both comprehension ( t 21 = 2.37, p = 0.027) and word production ( t 21 = 5.85, p < 0.001), and almost significant for sentence production ( t 21 = 2.06, p = 0.052).

also in 1,858 other papers

near-significantp = 0.06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

When we re-examined the time window 350–450 ms for the 23 subjects in the test phase, with Group as between-subjects variable, we observed, besides the significant interaction of Familiarity × Quadrant ( F 3,63 = 5.53, p = 0.003), two interactions with the factor Group: a significant Familiarity × Group ( F 1,21 = 24.3, p < 0.001), and a near-significant three-way Familiarity × Quadrant × Group ( F 3,63 = 2.67, p = 0.06).

also in 2,306 other papers

narrowly missed significancep = 0.077so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

There was an effect of Familiarity that narrowly missed significance ( F 1,27 = 3.39, p = 0.077), and a significant interaction of Familiarity with Quadrant ( F 3,81 = 2.74, p = 0.05).

also in 112 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.