close to significancep = 0.051
The main effect of Task was significant [ F (1, 44) = 4.17, p = 0.047], and the interaction of Task by Age was close to significance [ F (1, 44) = 4.01, p = 0.051].
The main effect of Task was significant [ F (1, 44) = 4.17, p = 0.047], and the interaction of Task by Age was close to significance [ F (1, 44) = 4.01, p = 0.051].
The main effect of Task showed a trend toward significance [ F (1, 44) = 3.79, p = 0.058] revealing that the magnitude of the aftereffects varied according to the task performed during the adaptation phase.
Post-hoc comparisons revealed a trend toward significance for a greater overall mean deviation in the old group, who performed the task in the order ecological-pointing ( M = 2.31°, SD = ±0.75), than in the order pointing-ecological ( M = 1.55°, SD = ±0.22, p = 0.073).