marginally significantp = .06
Finally, the interaction between Task and Block was also statistically significant in SDNN F (2.88, 69.05) = 3.26, p = .028, η 2 p = .12 and marginally significant in rMSSD F (2.59, 62.28) = 2.67, p = .06, η 2 p = .10.
Finally, the interaction between Task and Block was also statistically significant in SDNN F (2.88, 69.05) = 3.26, p = .028, η 2 p = .12 and marginally significant in rMSSD F (2.59, 62.28) = 2.67, p = .06, η 2 p = .10.
The low-fit group was also slower in the range of the 10% fastest RTs than the high-fit group (238±17 ms and 230±11 ms for the low-fit and high-fit, respectively), although this difference failed to reach statistical significance, t (24) = 1.41, p = .17.