Exploring modality switching effects in negated sentences: further evidence for grounded representations.

Front Psychol · 2013 · PMC3584287 · PMID 23450002

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0650

closest p · 1.3× alpha

0.0960

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.065so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

For true sentences, we found a marginally significant effect of Modality switch [ F (1, 10) = 4.28, MSE = 20.72, p = 0.065] in the frontal electrodes, where mismatch showed a greater positivity than match (0.929 vs. 0.126 μV, difference 0.803).

also in 26,082 other papers

failed to reach significancep = 0.090so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

0.192 μV, difference 0.436) but failed to reach significance [ F (1, 10) = 3.52, MSE = 7.42, p = 0.090].

also in 4,113 other papers

showed a trendp = 0.096so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The fixed effect of Modality showed a trend [ F (1, 1318) = 2.78, p = 0.096] whereby slower response times were seen in the Matched compared to Mismatched condition (739.6 and 716.6 ms; d = 0.033).

also in 53,322 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.