Interactive informed consent: randomized comparison with paper consents.

PLoS One · 2013 · PMC3590180 · PMID 23484041

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0700

closest p · 1.4× alpha

0.0900

boldest claim

The sentences

a definite trendp = .07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Paper groups, there was a definite trend (p = .07, chi-squared test) in the direction of iPad subjects scoring better (mean correct = 77%) compared with paper (mean correct = 57%).

also in 212 other papers

approached significancep = .09so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

When all participants were combined, the differences in overall satisfaction rating favoring the iPad approached significance (p = .09, Wilcoxon signed-ranks test).

also in 4,734 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.