The role of task-related learned representations in explaining asymmetries in task switching.

No other main or interaction effects approached significance [main effect for symbol type, F (1,25) = 0.33, p = .571, η 2 = .01, task×symbol type interaction, F (1,25) = 0.01, p = .914, η 2 <.001, task×switch condition interaction, F (1,25) = 0.15, p = .699, η 2 = .01, and the three-way interaction, F (1,25) = 2.11, p = .159, η 2 = .08].

also in 8,237 other papers

Also, when repeat conditions were compared against their respective switch conditions (i.e., switch size, switch symbol and switch both) within each symbol type and size conditions, all of the contrasts failed to reach significance.

also in 4,113 other papers