New tests to measure individual differences in matching and labelling facial expressions of emotion, and their association with ability to recognise vocal emotions and facial identity.

PLoS One · 2013 · PMC3695959 · PMID 23840821

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0010

closest p · 0.0× alpha

0.0900

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp <.001actually significant

In the 100-item versions, highly significant inversion effects were evident on both our new tasks: Emotion-matching (upright: M = 77.59, SD = 7.64; inverted: M = 68.28, SD = 6.88; t (96) = 4.75, p <.001) and Emotion-labelling (upright: M = 83.10, SD = 6.87; inverted: M = 67.50, SD = 9.84; t (96) = 7.99, p <.001).

also in 132,142 other papers

approached significancep = .09so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Performance on the vocal emotion-labelling task was associated with that on our face emotion-labelling task with parametric analyses ( r = .26, p = .02 [r upper = .72]) but only approached significance with non-parametric analyses ( rho = .19, p = .09) ( Figure 6a ).

also in 8,237 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.