Effects of speaker emotional facial expression and listener age on incremental sentence processing.

PLoS One · 2013 · PMC3765193 · PMID 24039781

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0240

closest p · 0.5× alpha

0.0600

boldest claim

The sentences

a significant trendp = .024actually significant

First, there was a significant trend in the analysis by items towards a Sentence x Age interaction, ( F2 (1,27) = 5.71, p = .024; F1 (1,62) = 2.56, p = .11).

also in 6,184 other papers

marginally significantp = .06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Furthermore the Face x Sentence x Age interaction was marginally significant ( p = .06, cf. the blue bars in Fig. 6 ): In the negative sentence conditions, the negative (vs. positive) face did not appear to affect accuracy in the young group ( M = .88, SE = 0.03 vs.

also in 14,984 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.