highly significantp=7.0×10 -28
Expectedly, a highly significant naming deficit became obvious for LIP in comparison to HIP (p=7.0×10 -28 ) and healthy controls (p=9.1×10 -29 ) (Figure 2 C).
Expectedly, a highly significant naming deficit became obvious for LIP in comparison to HIP (p=7.0×10 -28 ) and healthy controls (p=9.1×10 -29 ) (Figure 2 C).
Also, age-at-prodrome (median, range for LIP: 19, 12–66, for HIP: 23, 2–47, p=0.054) and age-of-onset (LIP: 23, 15–67, HIP: 27, 8–55, p=0.0079) were only close to or nominally significant, i.e. above the Bonferroni corrected significance threshold (p>0.005).