highly significantp<.001
We found that the main effect of grade was nonsignificant but the main effect of numerosity was highly significant ( F (3.49, 164.16) = 395.02, p<.001, power= .99).
We found that the main effect of grade was nonsignificant but the main effect of numerosity was highly significant ( F (3.49, 164.16) = 395.02, p<.001, power= .99).
Furthermore, the size of the Counting Effect also predicted fluency in calculation, although this association only approached significance.
The size of CE explained a marginally significant amount of unique variance in fluency (5.5%) and the size of NDE did not significantly contribute to explaining individual variability in the measures of later mathematics achievement.