Dogs' Eavesdropping from people's reactions in third party interactions.

PLoS One · 2013 · PMC3827296 · PMID 24236108

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0200

closest p · 0.4× alpha

0.1100

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantP = 0.02actually significant

The difference between groups GV (87%) and V (53%) was marginally significant (corrected α = 0.017, Z = 1.99, P = 0.02), though the difference between groups G (67%) and V (53%) was non-significant ( Z = 0.74, P = 0.23), and the difference between groups GV (87%) and G (67%) was not significant either ( Z = 1.29, P = 0.09).

also in 26,082 other papers

did not reach statistical significanceP = 0.11not close (p > 0.1)

In groups G and V, the comparison of gaze duration towards each donor did not reach statistical significance (group G: positive donor: 1.65 +4.62 –1.65; negative donor: 0 s +1.65 –0; Z = 1.60, P = 0.11; group V: positive: 1.32 + 1.65 – 1.32; negative donor: 2.64 +.99 –2.64; Z = 1.06, P = 0.29).

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.