Deficits in a Simple Visual Go/No-go Discrimination Task in Two Mouse Models of Huntington's Disease.

PLoS Curr · 2013 · PMC3828223 · PMID 24270512

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0800

closest p · 1.6× alpha

0.1000

boldest claim

The sentences

fell just short of significanceP < 0.08so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Follow-up analysis of this interaction component revealed that there was significant learning in both genotypes (smaller F (11,176) = 11.39, P s < 0.0001), while the two genotypes were significantly different at all test days except day 1, where there was no genotype difference (F < 1.00, P > 0.5), and day 6, where the difference fell just short of significance (F (1,176) = 3.23, P < 0.08; smallest remaining F (1,176) = 7.49, all P s < 0.01).

also in 102 other papers

fell short of significanceP > 0.1so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Nevertheless, all mice appeared to show learning, with a significant main effect of Session, (F (11,88) = 10.60, P < 0.001), although the Genotype X Session interaction fell short of significance (F (11,88) = 1.57, P > 0.1).

also in 361 other papers

failed to reach significanceP < 0.1so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

approached significanceno p-value reported

The interaction between Light/Dark condition and Genotype failed to reach significance (F (1,18) = 3.26, P < 0.1), and no other effects or interactions approached significance (largest F (1,18) = 1.05, remaining Fs < 1, all P s > 0.3).

also in 8,237 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.