Neural correlates of uncertain decision making: ERP evidence from the Iowa Gambling Task.

Front Hum Neurosci · 2013 · PMC3828619 · PMID 24298248

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0600

closest p · 1.2× alpha

0.0600

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.060so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Further analysis of the three way interaction revealed that the interaction between Type of deck and Laterality showed significant differences in different regions, i.e., the interaction was significant in the frontal ( p = 0.007) and central ( p = 0.009) regions and marginally significant in the parietal region ( p = 0.060).

also in 26,082 other papers

showed a trendno p-value reported

From Figure 2B , we saw different trends for each deck: the number of plays with deck D remained high throughout the task, while the number of plays for deck C showed a trend toward an increase over the course.

also in 53,322 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.