only marginally significantp = .063
In the masking task, the data showed a mid-level hump pattern, although the effect of μ soft was only marginally significant, F (2, 12) = 3.69, p = .063, η 2 p = .38, = .91.
In the masking task, the data showed a mid-level hump pattern, although the effect of μ soft was only marginally significant, F (2, 12) = 3.69, p = .063, η 2 p = .38, = .91.