Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Attention capture by abrupt onsets: re-visiting the priority tag model.

Front Psychol · 2013 · PMC3868916 · PMID 24391620

3
hedged sentences
0.0010
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0510
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < 0.001actually significant
There was no significant effect when the target was a no-onset item, F < 1, but a highly significant effect when the target was an onset, F (4, 84) = 16.18, p < 0.001: RTs increased on average by 103 ms from one onset to six onsets.

also in 132,142 other papers

marginally significantp = 0.051so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
A 2 × 6 repeated measures ANOVA with the factors target type (no-onset, onset) and number of onsets (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 items) revealed a marginally significant main effect for target type, F (1, 11) = 4.78, p = 0.051, due to the somewhat higher error rate with no-onset targets than with onset targets (3.7 vs. 2.7%, respectively).

also in 26,082 other papers

However, in comparison to Experiment 1, these differences between the 1–2-tag and the 2–8-tag models did not reach statistical significance.

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.