Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Rewarding distractor context versus rewarding target location: a commentary on Tseng and Lleras (2013).

Atten Percept Psychophys · 2014 · PMC3982235 · PMID 24664853

2
hedged sentences
0.3660
closest p · 7.3× alpha
0.3660
boldest claim

The sentences

failed to reach significancep = .366not close (p > 0.1)
For low-reward displays, we observed at least some tendency for the cueing effect to develop later in time, although the effect failed to reach significance in any of the four epochs [Epoch 1: 8 ms, t (24) = 0.3, p = .366; Epoch 2: 29 ms, t (24) = 1.6, p = .189; Epoch 3: 41 ms, t (24) = 2.0, p = .120, Epoch 4: 27 ms, t (24) = 1.1, p = .263].

also in 4,113 other papers

approached significanceno p-value reported
old displays with low reward only approached significance: both p s > .20; see below).

also in 8,237 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.