Money talks: neural substrate of modulation of fairness by monetary incentives.

Front Behav Neurosci · 2014 · PMC4017157 · PMID 24834034

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0620

closest p · 1.2× alpha

0.0900

boldest claim

The sentences

showed a trendp = 0.062so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

A post-hoc analysis revealed that the rejection rate for the unfair proposals with a high stake size was lower than that for the unfair proposals with a low stake size in the human condition ( p = 0.012), whereas this difference only showed a trend toward significance in the computer condition ( p = 0.062).

also in 53,322 other papers

marginally significantp = 0.068so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The interaction effect of the fairness category and stake size was marginally significant [ F (1, 27) = 3.61, p = 0.068, partial η 2 = 0.118].

also in 26,082 other papers

a trend toward significancep = 0.09so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

There was a trend toward significance in interaction among the three factors [ F (1, 27) = 3.09, p = 0.09, partial η 2 = 0.103].

also in 3,729 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.