Incidental memory of younger and older adults for objects encountered in a real world context.

PLoS One · 2014 · PMC4062423 · PMID 24941065

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0600

closest p · 1.2× alpha

0.0720

boldest claim

The sentences

showed a trendp = 0.06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Naivety scores were modestly but significantly positively correlated with recognition of the context-atypical objects (point-biserial correlation, r = .21, p <0.05) and unfamiliar objects ( r = .25, p <0.01) and showed a trend toward a positive correlation for context-typical objects ( r = .16, p = 0.06).

also in 53,322 other papers

marginally significantp = .072so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Testing-naïve older adults showed a tendency for higher recognition of near- than far-distance objects, particularly for context-atypical and unfamiliar objects, with this pattern marginally significant (p = .072) for the unfamiliar objects ( M near = .73, .85, and .79 for context-typical, context-atypical, and unfamiliar; M far = .71, .77, and .60, respectively).

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.