Brain-potential analysis of visual word recognition in dyslexics and typically reading children.

Front Hum Neurosci · 2014 · PMC4075352 · PMID 25071507

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0510

closest p · 1.0× alpha

0.0690

boldest claim

The sentences

fell short of significancep = 0.051so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The main effect of Dyslexia, just fell short of significance, F (1,37) = 4.06, p = 0.051, η 2 = 0.09, but was included in a three-way interaction with Hemisphere and Electrode, F (3,128) = 3.02, p = 0.026, η 2 = 0.07.

also in 361 other papers

approached significancep = 0.069so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

All other effects were not significant, p s > 0.178, although the main effect of Dyslexia approached significance, F (1,37) = 3.51, p = 0.069, η 2 = 0.09, suggesting a trend for shorter latencies in dyslexics relative to typical readers.

also in 8,237 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.