A fan effect in anaphor processing: effects of multiple distractors.

Front Psychol · 2014 · PMC4114326 · PMID 25120519

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0700

closest p · 1.4× alpha

0.0800

boldest claim

The sentences

nearly significantp = 0.07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The main effect of reference was nearly significant in the subjects analysis, F 1(1, 64) = 3.38, p = 0.07, η 2 p = 0.05, but non-significant in the items analysis, F 2(1, 29) = 2.32, p = 0.14, and the interaction between reference and nouns was not significant, F 1(1, 64) = 0.65, p = 0.42, F 2(1, 29) = 1.09, p = 0.31.

also in 3,349 other papers

not quite significantp = 0.08so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The main effect of nouns was not quite significant, F 1(1, 64) = 3.08, p = 0.08, F 2(1, 29) = 1.56, p = 0.22, although the pattern observed in Experiments 1A, 1B, and 2A appeared once again, with shorter reading times when there were more nouns.

also in 653 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.