Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Proactive and reactive stopping when distracted: an attentional account.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform · 2014 · PMC4120704 · PMID 24842070

2
hedged sentences
0.0700
closest p · 1.4× alpha
0.0700
boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = .07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Follow-up tests showed that the difference between central and noncentral blocks was significant, t (23) = 2.73, p = .01 (one-tailed directional t test: p = .006), 4 Cohen’s d = .55; the differences between central-signal and no-signal blocks, and between no-signal and noncentral blocks were marginally significant; t (23) = 1.91, p = .07 (one-tailed directional t test: p = .035), Cohen’s d = .39, and t (23) = 1.81, p = .08 (one-tailed directional t test: p = .041), Cohen’s d = .37, respectively.

also in 26,082 other papers

In this pilot study, we found a small numerical interaction between proactive and reactive stopping and distractor interference, but which failed to reach statistical significance (see online supplemental material).

also in 6,035 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.