Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Computerized neuropsychological assessment in aging: testing efficacy and clinical ecology of different interfaces.

Comput Math Methods Med · 2014 · PMC4131509 · PMID 25147578

2
hedged sentences
0.1160
closest p · 2.3× alpha
0.1160
boldest claim

The sentences

showed a trendP = 0.116not close (p > 0.1)
The interaction between group of participants and effects showed a trend toward significance ( F (2,66) = 2.357, P = 0.116, Greenhouse-Geisser correction) and a plot of this 2-way interaction showed a reduced CE and an incremental AE and OE effect for the touch group (see Figure 2 ); pairwise, post hoc comparisons revealed a trend towards significance when considering C

also in 53,322 other papers

a trend toward significanceP = 0.116not close (p > 0.1)
a trend towards significanceP = 0.170not close (p > 0.1)
The interaction between group of participants and effects showed a trend toward significance ( F (2,66) = 2.357, P = 0.116, Greenhouse-Geisser correction) and a plot of this 2-way interaction showed a reduced CE and an incremental AE and OE effect for the touch group (see Figure 2 ); pairwise, post hoc comparisons revealed a trend towards significance when considering CE differences between groups (mean difference, Touch − Mouse = −37.280; P = 0.170) in terms of a reduced CE for the touch, while the two groups differed to a lesser degree for the OE (Mean Difference, Touch − Mouse = 18,218; P = 0.232) and AE (Mean Difference, Touch − Mouse = 16,418; P = 0.261). 5.2.

also in 3,729 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.