Is rumination after bereavement linked with loss avoidance? Evidence from eye-tracking.

PLoS One · 2014 · PMC4139328 · PMID 25140524

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0700

closest p · 1.4× alpha

0.0800

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = .07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

For this outcome variable, the overall test for rumination was marginally significant, F (6,32) = 2.16, p = .07, p η 2 = .29.

also in 26,082 other papers

showed a trendp = .08so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

High ruminators, compared to low ruminators, showed a trend for shorter fixation times for pictures of the deceased combined with a loss-related word, F (1,37) = 2.02, p = .08, p η 2 = .05.

also in 53,322 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.