nearly significantp = .08
For females, the amount of variance in wrongness of promiscuity explained by income ratio was nearly significant in the predicted direction and small, β = −.05, t (1,045) = −1.75, p = .08.
For females, the amount of variance in wrongness of promiscuity explained by income ratio was nearly significant in the predicted direction and small, β = −.05, t (1,045) = −1.75, p = .08.