Treatment of visuospatial neglect with biparietal tDCS and cognitive training: a single-case study.

Front Syst Neurosci · 2014 · PMC4179329 · PMID 25324736

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0010

closest p · 0.0× alpha

0.0520

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < 0.001actually significant

The main interaction of Time, Condition, and Test was highly significant [ F (12, 456) = 19.51, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.34].

also in 132,142 other papers

a strong trendp = 0.052so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The significant interaction for left invalid stimuli was partly explained by a strong trend of the single active condition leading to a larger improvement than the single sham condition [ F (1, 40) = 4.00, p = 0.052, η 2 p = 0.09], but was mainly explained by a significantly larger improvement after repeated combined treatment as compared to cognitive training alone [ F (1, 40) = 21.12, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.35].

also in 5,725 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.