Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Behavioural and physiological effects of finely balanced decision-making in chickens.

PLoS One · 2014 · PMC4183509 · PMID 25275440

2
hedged sentences
closest p
boldest claim

The sentences

Although the coefficient of variance was influenced by experimental condition, the difference was not quite statistically significant, and there were no treatment-related differences in latency to the first push and the RR interval, suggesting that the observed differences in pen measures were unlikely to be caused by the difficulty of decision-making.

also in 341 other papers

a strong trendno p-value reported
However, there was a strong trend for a lower SDNN/RR when making a finely balanced decision compared to an unbalanced one (range of individual standard deviation: finely balanced = 0.006–0.01, unbalanced = 0.002–0.05; t 13 = 2.10, p = 0.055, figure 6 b ).

also in 5,725 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.