The influence of stimulus format on drawing--a functional imaging study of decision making in portrait drawing.

Neuroimage · 2014 · PMC4229501 · PMID 25128710

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0450

closest p · 0.9× alpha

0.0450

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.045actually significant

There was a marginally significant relationship for the parietal ROI (r = 0.27 p = 0.045 DOF = 54); the regression was not significant for the ventral occipital ROI including the cluster shown in Figs. 6 A,B.

also in 26,082 other papers

approached significanceno p-value reported

The differences between line (FL-AL) and defined (FD-AD), p = .068, and between line (FL-AL) and undefined (FU-AU), p = .057, approached significance.

also in 8,237 other papers

an overall trendno p-value reported

There was an overall trend for our quantitative measures of inaccuracy in drawing (the rising dissimilarity and rotation scores) to follow the same order of changes seen in ocular metrics especially across silhouette, defined and undefined formats.

also in 4,871 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.