Where does HIT fit? An examination of the affective response to high-intensity intervals in comparison to continuous moderate- and continuous vigorous-intensity exercise in the exercise intensity-affect continuum.

PLoS One · 2014 · PMC4259348 · PMID 25486273

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0700

closest p · 1.4× alpha

0.0800

boldest claim

The sentences

nearing significancep = .07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Interestingly, the results suggested a preference for HIT over CMI with results nearing significance ( p = .07, d = .51).

also in 225 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep = .08so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Interestingly, PACES results are in line with Barlett and colleagues (2011), who found participants enjoyed HIT more than continuous moderate-intensity type exercise, although the differences between HIT and CMI in our study did not reach statistical significance ( p = .08).

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.