Comparison of outcomes and utilization of extracranial-intracranial bypass versus intracranial stenting for intracranial stenosis.

Surg Neurol Int · 2014 · PMC4287911 · PMID 25593762

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.1750

closest p · 3.5× alpha

0.1750

boldest claim

The sentences

did not reach statistical significanceP = 0.175not close (p > 0.1)

Slightly, more males underwent ICS (53.7% male, 46.3% female), whereas slightly more females underwent EC-IC bypass (48.4% male, 51.6% female), but these gender differences did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.175).

also in 111,027 other papers

did not quite reach statistical significanceno p-value reported

In asymptomatic patients, however, the difference in death rate among patients who underwent ICS versus EC-IC bypass did not quite reach statistical significance.

also in 679 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.