a strong trendp = 0.052
In particular, the antOFC lesioned group displayed a strong trend for increased distance from the snake [One-Way ANOVA, F (2, 11) = 3.90, p = 0.052; post-hoc pairwise comparison for “control” vs. “antOFC” p = 0.018] (Figure 7C ), both antOFC and vlPFC groups avoided staring at the snake [One-Way ANOVA, F (2, 11) = 5.35, p = 0.024; post-hoc pairwise comparison for