Spatially specific vs. unspecific disruption of visual orientation perception using chronometric pre-stimulus TMS.

Front Behav Neurosci · 2015 · PMC4311643 · PMID 25688194

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0560

closest p · 1.1× alpha

0.0740

boldest claim

The sentences

approached significanceP = 0.056so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The interaction remained significant for orientation discrimination performance for the filtered data ( F (5,50) = 2.652; P = 0.033; η 2 = 0.210), approached significance for the unfiltered data ( F (2.988,29.877) = 2.823; P = 0.056; η 2 = 0.220), approached significance for unfiltered subjective ratings ( F (5,50) = 2.358; P = 0.054; η 2 = 0.191), though significance was not reached for filtered subjective ratings.

also in 8,237 other papers

a statistical trendp = 0.074so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Separate RM-ANOVAs resulted in a statistical trend for SOA for LL ( F (2.325,25.577) = 2.773; p = 0.074) and a significant effect of SOA for UR ( F (1.914,21.053) = 17.892; p < 0.001; η 2 = 0.619).

also in 2,798 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.