The tendency that RTs were shorter when the presentation eyes were congruent was only marginally significant none of the other interactions were significant [suppression × eye congruency: F (1,54) = 0.01, n.s. ; eye congruency × transition rules: F (2,108) = 0.05, n.s. ; three-way: F (2,108) = 0.003, n.s. ].
← all excerpts
Serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning.
1
—
—