There was the non-significant association with inner inter-canthal distance and bizygomatic distance in the age group 18-23 [ Table 3 ] There was a highly significant association of intercanine width with inter pupillary distance, outer inter-canthal distance, moderately significant with bizygomatic width and non-significant with inner inter-canthal distance and inter-alar distance in the age group 24-28 [ Table 3 ] There was a highly significant association of intercanine width with inter pupillary distance, suggestive significant with outer inter-canthal distance and non-significant with inner inter-canthal distance, inter-alar distance and bizygomatic width in the age group 29-35 [ Table 3 ].
← all excerpts
Intercanine width as a tool in two dimensional reconstruction of face: An aid in forensic dentistry.
1
—
—