Barely Significant
← all phrases

moderately significant

1,498 sentences · 1,498 papers · 2,548 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

P<0.11

Reported by Matthew Hankins, whose collection is the reason this phrase is on the list.

In the literature

moderately significantP = 0.00010.0× alphagold
One study reported a significant difference (MD: 25; 95% CI: 18.16–31.83; P = 0.0001), 27 , 30 and another found a moderately significant benefit (MD: 10.2; 95% CI: 5.91–14.48; P = 0.0001). 27 , 30 Two studies showed no significant differences ( P = 0.1622 and P = 0.2223, respectively). 26 , 36 Physical Well-being of the Chest The results were heterogeneous.
moderately significantp < 0.00010.0× alphagold
Interestingly, lesion location and gender—only moderately significant in univariate analysis (Cramér’s V = 0.2967; OR = 0.193, p < 0.0001, Table 2 )—gained weight in glmnet, suggesting interaction effects or dependencies not captured in univariate tests but revealed through multivariable modeling. 5.
moderately significantp < 1.0 × 10 −40.0× alphagold
Previous GWAS studies in East Asian populations (specifically in Korea) have investigated the genetic factors influencing the albumin-to-globulin ratio and identified two genome-wide significant signals ( p < 5 × 10 −8 ) along with 36 moderately significant signals ( p < 1.0 × 10 −4 ).
moderately significantP < 1 × 10 −40.0× alphagold
To further validate our findings in the proteome-wide cis -MR, we applied gIVW by including moderately significant ( P < 1 × 10 −4 ) and correlated (r 2 < 0.4) cis-pQTLs as instruments. 34 Out of the 53 associations of lipid fractions with plasma proteins, gIVW produced consistent and statistically significant estimates (Prange = 1.1 × 10 −28 to 0.05) for 43 associations ( Supplementary Table S5A ).
moderately significantp < 0.00010.0× alphagold
Spearman pairwise correlation of antibody inhibition between antigens demonstrates a moderately significant correlation between anti-SSP3 and anti-SPECT1 antibodies (r = 0.62 and p < 0.0001) as well as anti-SPECT1 and anti-CelTOS antibodies (r = 0.65, p < 0.0001), while a relatively weaker correlation albeit statistically significant was found between anti-SSP3 and anti-CelTOS (r = 0.41, p = 0.003) (Fig. 2 b).