Beauty matters: social preferences in a three-person ultimatum game.

PLoS One · 2015 · PMC4423917 · PMID 25951138

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0640

closest p · 1.3× alpha

0.0650

boldest claim

The sentences

approached significancep = 0.064so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The FRN amplitude of each condition is reported in S1 Fig Regarding the “unfair/unfair” ( p = 0.182) offers, no significant differences was found between the two face conditions, while comparisons for “fair/fair” offer approached significance ( p = 0.064). 3.4 P300 Regarding the central-parietal component P300 ( Fig 5 ), we observed a significant main effect for offer (F 1, 25 = 13.834, p <0.001) and electrode (F 1, 25 = 24.280, p <0.001), but no main effect of face (F 1, 25 = 3.342, p = 0.079).

also in 8,237 other papers

marginally significantp = 0.065so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The comparisons between acceptance ratios of “unfair/unfair” offer in two face conditions was marginally significant ( p = 0.065).

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.