God and the Welfare State - Substitutes or Complements? An Experimental Test of the Effect of Belief in God's Control.

PLoS One · 2015 · PMC4463850 · PMID 26061050

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0720

closest p · 1.4× alpha

0.0720

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = .072so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Three of the four interaction terms yield insignificant coefficients, indicating that the manipulations were overall effective regardless of the participant’s reported level of BGC (as reported by [ 35 ]), with the exception of a marginally significant interaction for the essay prime in the expenditure model (p = .072).

also in 26,082 other papers

did not reach statistical significanceno p-value reported

With respect to support for welfare expenditures, while the main effect of the prime did not reach statistical significance (cf.

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.