marginally significantp = .051
The Distractor Type X Lag interaction was marginally significant, F (2,39) = 3.095, p = .051, η p 2 = 0.074.
The Distractor Type X Lag interaction was marginally significant, F (2,39) = 3.095, p = .051, η p 2 = 0.074.
Interestingly, although no evidence of lag-1-sparing following an emotional distractor emerged in the group analysis, roughly half of the participants showed a trend towards better performance at lag-1 than at lag-2.