What's in a Surname? Physique, Aptitude, and Sports Type Comparisons between Tailors and Smiths.

PLoS One · 2015 · PMC4498760 · PMID 26161803

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0500

closest p · 1.0× alpha

0.0660

boldest claim

The sentences

nominally significantp < .05actually significant

However, the effects reported in Bäumler’s study [ 3 ] were small and nominally significant (two-tailed p < .05) only for bulkiness.

also in 7,732 other papers

fell short of significancep = .066so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

However, our reanalysis of [ 13 ] showed that this trend effect fell short of significance (exact p = .066) in this first, smaller, of the two studies [ 13 , 14 ], being nominally significant ( p = .029) only in the second, larger one [ 14 ].

also in 361 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.